Oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating
Now, of course, benchmarks aren’t what you should base your purchase on anyway since they don’t reflect real world performance.
![oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating](https://fscl01.fonpit.de/userfiles/7682239/image/geekbench_banned_devices_oneplus-w596.jpg)
All little cores are affected and kept at 1.9GHz, and it is through this cheat that OnePlus achieves some of the highest GeekBench 4 scores of a Snapdragon 835 to date.” While there are no governor switches when a user enters a benchmark (at least, we can’t seem to see that’s the case), the minimum frequency of the little cluster jumps to the maximum frequency as seen under performance governors.
![oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating](https://mspoweruser.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/OnePlus-9-GeekBench-Benchmark.jpg)
“…it resorts to the kind of obvious, calculated cheating mechanisms we saw in flagships in the early days of Android, an approach that is clearly intended to maximize scores in the most misleading fashion. On the OnePlus 5, the company has implemented this “cheat” to essentially be turning things to maximum whenever a benchmark is active. However, on former phones, OnePlus was a bit more subtle with this method. This isn’t something new to the 5, as the company has done this multiple times in the past. To do that, the phone essentially activates a “performance mode” when it detects a benchmarking app has been opened to jack up the numbers. XDA revealed yesterday that the OnePlus 5 appears to be cheating on benchmarking applications to achieve a higher score. One would think that the raw power there wouldn’t require any sort of help on benchmarks, but it seems that isn’t the case. If it were, then boosting performance for benchmarks would be fair game - but as it is, it’s not a true reflection of how the phone performs in demanding situations.On paper, the OnePlus 5 is an incredible smartphone, packing basically the most powerful processing package available on the market today. In its statement, the company said it “always prioritizes the user experience rather than pursuing high benchmark scores - especially since there isn’t a direct connection between smartphone benchmarks and user experiences.” And yet, it still coded its phone to deliver higher performance when running a benchmark test.īut Huawei also claims that its phones’ include AI that’s smart enough to optimize performance based on whatever app is running, and clearly that’s not the case. They might speak to how well the phone performs under heavy stress, like while gaming, but a better test is to just play a game with it and find out what happens. Tweaking a phone to optimize benchmark apps might produce some numbers that make a small subset of nerds drool, but those numbers don’t correlate to the actual experience of using the phone. What’s funny about all of this is that benchmarks don’t really matter that much. Others have been caught doing this in the past
![oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating](https://abgeeauzno.cloudimg.io/v7/pokde.net/assets/uploads/2021/07/OnePlus-9-Pro-PCMark-spoof.png)
This timing is particularly unfortunate for Huawei, since just weeks ago it got caught trying to pass off a DSLR photo as a photo from one of its phones. Samsung got busted for the same behavior on its flagship phones in 2013, and just last year, OnePlus was found to have done the same. Huawei is far from the first company to get caught toying with benchmark results. That indicated that the phones weren’t actually smart enough to identify high performance demands on their own, which meant the benchmark score wasn’t an accurate reflection of how the phone would handle a typical app without special attention from Huawei.Īs punishment, 3DMark has removed these phones’ rankings from its leaderboard and adorned their listings on its website with a note that the phone’s “manufacturer has not complied with UL benchmark rules.” Many of their results have been removed as well. When UL ran an internal version of 3DMark, which Huawei’s phones couldn’t recognize the name of, the phones performed worse in the test. That’s what Huawei seems to have done, according to UL, which is behind the 3DMark software.
![oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating oneplus benchmarks geekbench over cheating](https://www.mobigyaan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/oneplus-5-benchmark-cheating-little-cluster.jpg)
While phones can adjust their performance as part of their typical behavior under high workloads, they can’t be hard coded to maximize their behavior just because a specific benchmark app is running. Huawei said it was AI, but UL found it wasn’tīut the way that Huawei implemented that behavior isn’t allowed.